User talk:Bbx

No fragmented discussions. If you post on this talk page, I will answer here, not on your own talk page.
Please start new discussions at the end of this page and use a proper ==Heading== for it.

Welcome

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. ...yada yada... Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 18:11, 19 Jan 2004 (UTC)

about Nousukausi

Hi Bbx. Have you watched that movie? I'm going to watch it soon in an upcoming European Union film festival here in 3 weeks time. The plot does sound interesting to me. --*drew 00:48, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Hi, yes I saw it a couple of months ago. It's pretty good, i voted 7/10 for it on IMDb. I don't know if you have seen many Finnish movies, but Nousukausi is very typical Finnish style. bbx 04:57, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I see. Nousukausi will be the 1st time I watch Finnish movie. Its non-typical plot induces me to watch it. Here, it will be shown just once among other European movies in conjunction with the film festival. --*drew 07:37, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I think you will enjoy it, I can recommend you a personal Finnish favourite, Cyclomania. Watch it if you ever get a chance :) bbx 09:38, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)

aye aye :) --*drew 09:44, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

I'm legally required to ask permission before I would try to use your contributions under a different license. I apologize for having to use a WikiSpam-like message to do so, but it is just not practical to write thousands of people individual for something of this magnitude. I would hope you would consider my proposal regardless of whether or not I employeed a bot to ask you. If not, I will add your name to the list of people who have opted out. Thanks for your time. – Ram-Man ^{(comment) (talk)}[[]] 23:54, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)

Okay, well I don't have the time or the will to read about it now. I'll release my stuff under CCL any time if you just make it easy for me. Otherwise I'll just press "Save page" as usual because I'm so lazy =P bbx 00:12, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Canadian Security Establishment

cringes at myself* Sorry for that bad redirect, and thank you for fixing it. Samaritan 12:10, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- No problem mate :) bbx 13:01, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)

13 Going On 30

The proper capitalization is 13 Going on 30. I've moved it back. Rick K 01:12, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)

Not according to Sony Pictures and IMDb. They spell it as "13 Going On 30". bbx 01:21, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- How strange. Well, I'll change it back, then. RickK 01:30, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)
  - Yep, it's pretty strange. But thanks for changing back. bbx 01:32, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)

LBM

Thanks for the quick edit on that blasphemy which was inserted into Lake Bodom murders. My eyebrows started twitching when I read the edit's summary. :P Cheers. --Sn0wflake 19:31, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)

No problem mate =) Cheers. bbx 19:59, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Wikistandard

Don't remove wikification. "External links" is the standard, and there is even an on-going project to change all singular instaces to the plural. --Sn0wflake 20:08, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

And you shouldn't remove valid dismabiguations. bbx 22:51, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I believe the standard procedure would be starting an edit war, but you might be right. I just think it's an unlikely mistake. Too much trouble for one line of text. :) --Sn0wflake 00:50, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Not that unlikely, it seems. While doing reserach I bumped into more sites about the disease that about the band, even though it's a misspell. Good call on adding the disambig note. Anyway, I am going to start editing Klam soon, so if you feel like pitching in, do so. Cheers. --Sn0wflake 20:19, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Good thing thats solved. It's a misspell in English but proper spelling in a few other languages, Finnish being one of them. I'll keep an eye on your edits to the article and add/correct anything if i can. bbx 20:30, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

More schools on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion

As of March 25, 2005, there are an additional (6) articles listed for deletion under the POV notion that schools are non-notable (even though this is invalid reasoning as per the Wikipedia deletion policy). Please be aware that the following schools are actively being discussed and voted upon:

In response to this cyclical ordeal, a Schoolwatch programme has been initiated in order to indentify school-related articles which may need improvement and to help foster and encourage continued organic growth. Your comments are welcome and I thank you again for your time. --GRider\^talk

COTW Project

You voted for Decolonization, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. Tony Jin | (talk) 02:23, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)

Nämen

schabblade lite med den där tveksamma listan med finlandssvenskar, och stötte på ditt namn i diskussionshistoriken. Tänkte bara säga hej... /Habj 19:16, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I can understand that, but a short comment I think should be OK... /Habj 00:49, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Yes of course, it's the free encyclopedia :) bbx 00:52, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

List of warez groups on VfD

Please see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/List of warez groups for an ongoing discussion regarding the potential deletion of the List of warez groups article. —RaD Man (talk) 00:49, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for noticing me. bbx 01:27, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bewitched

I saw the disambiguation page you created on Bewitched (disambiguation). I'm confused about the Frank Sinatra song you name. Do you mean Bewitched, Bothered and Bewildered? or maybe "Witchcraft"? Thanks. SDC 23:06, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I meant Bewitched, Bothered and Bewildered. My source was bad and I guess it shouldn't be on the disambig. I'll remove it. Thanks for noticing it. bbx 09:30, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Union member states at the 2004 Summer Olympics

You might be interested to have a look. Regards. --Pgreenfinch 16:05, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Babben Larsson

Hi - I think I ought to explain my edits on this page I made; just out of politeness, and since I realise that in Swedish, it would be correct :) The date is incorrect without the 'th' in 29th, and even if it's an island, you're always born 'in' a country. 9cds 03:11, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you're right about the "in" part thanks for correcting me. The date is right too but according to the Manual of Style, [[October 29]] is to be used. bbx 03:27, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oops - thanks! 9cds 03:35, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Translation!?

Can you help translate this for me to swedish? Many thanks in advance!

For a small country, Albania is endowed with considerable resources. The southwestern part of the country is rich in petroleum and natural gas. The northeastern region has substantial reserves of metallic mineral deposits, including chromium, copper, and iron-nickel. Large deposits of lignite (soft coal) are found near Tiranë, and natural asphalt is mined near Selenicë.

Albania is also rich in rivers and streams with significant hydroelectric potential. These have been exploited quite effectively, making the country an energy exporter. A number of huge hydroelectric power plants have been built, mainly on the Drin River, and more than half of the country's arable land is irrigated, largely from the artificial reservoirs created upstream of the dams.

--Armour 14:06, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wear it out with your health, as we say in Swedish:

För att vara ett litet land har Albanien avsevärt mycket naturtillgångar. Den sydvästra delen av landet är rikt på petroleum och naturgas. Den nordöstra regionen har en betydande reserver av metalliska mineraler så som krom, koppar och järnnickel. Stora mängder av lignit (brunkol) finns i området runt Tirana, naturlig asfalt utvinns i området runt Selenica.

Albanien har många floder och strömmar med en betytande hydroelektrisk potential. Dessa har utnyttjas effektivt vilket gjort landet till en energiexportör. Ett antal vattenkraft har byggts, huvudsakligen vid floden Drin. Mer än halva landets odlingsbara mark är konstbevattnad, till stor del av konstgjorda reservoarer byggda uppströms från dammarna.

bbx 17:24, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Color Fantasy

Discussion moved to Talk:M/S Color Fantasy.

Image Tagging Image:Antoine de Saint-Exupery.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Antoine de Saint-Exupery.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.

My RFA

Thank you for supporting my RFA. I appreciated the show of support and all the kind words. If there's ever anything I can do to help with my new administrator status, please don't hesitate to contact me. --Myles Long 14:21, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

80.221.131.251 report on WP:RFI

Can you cite a source for the correct date for Michael Monroe, both to check that the original one actually is correct, and to make it easier to spot vandal edits in future? If you do that I'll block the IP when it does it again. Please let me know on my talk page when that happens. Petros471 09:03, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1942

Finnwars is up for AFD again. Also List of Battlefield 1942 mods is also AFD'd. Bfelite 03:05, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I already voted to keep Finnwars, and now I added my support for the other article aswell. bbx 10:20, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burlington Center Mall compromise

There is a compromise possibly developing at the above discussion that should please inclusionists, deletionists, mergists, and eventualists. Drop by and see what you think, if you wish. youngamerican (talk) 13:26, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2nd AFD nom for List of Battlefield 1942 mods

You may be interested in the List of Battlefield 1942 mods AFD. It has been been nominated by the same user again. Bfelite 14:07, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Krangparty

Hej! Schysst att du hade en bra bild som du delade med dig, jag laddade upp den på commons för användning på den svenska wikipedia. Tack från en krangare till en annan :=) Unsigned comment by ReCover 02:50, 1 July 2006

Tack, jag hade tänkt lägga upp den på Commons men det blev här på Wikipedia i misstag, schysst att du fixade det åt mig. Vi ses på Krangparty act 13!. bbx 16:49, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Act 13 blev ju försenat :( Jag tog iallafall och taggade krangparty bilden på engelska wikipedia för deletion efter jag kopierade över beskrivningen... --ReCover 17:34, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Schoonmaker again

You may be interested in this: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L. Craig Schoonmaker (3rd nomination). Ground Zero | t 19:05, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

El rancho charter school.

There has been some discussion on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El rancho charter school which may interest you(although given that you are a self-identifying eventualist I doubt this will alter your opinion much). JoshuaZ 01:48, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notyfing me. I changed my argumentaiton in the AfD. bbx 10:56, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sighsten Herrgård

I notice you wrote the article on Sighsten Herrgård. He seems to have been quite a significant figure, and I think he should be included in the List of HIV-positive people. However, I can't find a reference in English that verifies his HIV-positive status. Do you know of any reference (in any language)? Thanks. Trezatium 11:13, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added a link to an article in Aftonbladet I used as my main source when writing the article. I hope it is enough to qualify for the list. bbx 18:55, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much - that's a great reference. Trezatium 19:07, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Elonka

Thank you very much for your support in my RfA. Unfortunately consensus was not reached, and the nomination was not successful. However, I do appreciate your comments, am still in support of the Wikipedia project, and will continue to contribute without interruption. Thanks again! --Elonka 11:00, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3nd AFD nom for List of Battlefield 1942 mods

You may be interested in the List of Battlefield 1942 mods AFD. Bfelite 14:07, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Nykarleby.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Nykarleby.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:42, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Visa roster commodore 64 vocally cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Visa roster commodore 64 vocally cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 07:25, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No fragmented discussion...

... but maybe you'd still like to wish me welcome on my talk? There is a point, you see. (Oh, and do use a welcome template.)

Pretty please? :P // Konvalj 20:11, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, why not. Welcome. bbx 13:56, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re : Welcome

Thank you for welcoming me to the English Wikipedia. I think I'll like it here! ;-) // Konvalj 10:09, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nectarine (radio)

A tag has been placed on Nectarine (radio), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Nectarine (radio). Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. RJASE1 ^Talk 01:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Nectarine (radio). If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. RJASE1 ^Talk 03:28, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please dont speedy perfectly good articles. Thank you. bbx 03:29, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing personal, but it doesn't claim notability per WP:WEB. If it meets the notability criteria, I'm all in favor of keeping it. RJASE1 ^Talk 03:34, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Nectarine (radio)

I've nominated Nectarine (radio), an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Nectarine (radio) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nectarine (radio) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Nectarine (radio) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. RJASE1 ^Talk 03:45, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Greatgianasisters-hiscore.png

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Greatgianasisters-hiscore.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Non-free use disputed for Image:Eurowaylogo.png

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Eurowaylogo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:51, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Kim carnes mistaken identity.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kim carnes mistaken identity.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:00, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi friend, I was wondering - can you translate between English and Swedish? Any help much appreciated, thanks! Scarian ^Talk 09:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please help

Centre 2000 is up for deletion again - you helped keep it once. :-( Also a similar article at Macleod Mall. Please weigh in on the discussion.68.144.31.71 02:57, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Kalevi Sorsa.png

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Kalevi Sorsa.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:59, 9 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 16:59, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Another world album cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Another world album cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:100_hojdare_title_screen.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:100_hojdare_title_screen.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 02:28, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Frans Suell

I have nominated Frans Suell, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frans Suell. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Gary King (talk) 20:14, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rglinelogo.png

I have tagged Image:Rglinelogo.png as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 22:49, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nukezone screenshot 2005.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Nukezone screenshot 2005.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:00, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Ms europa1993-01.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ms europa1993-01.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 16:38, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed this was up, updated the licensing tag & provided a fuller fair use rationale. — Kjet (talk · contribs) 09:22, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good job as usual, Kjet. bbx (talk) 09:32, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Color Line.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Color Line.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Zoo Fari 01:50, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Dr feelgood cover.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dr feelgood cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 18:45, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Bbx! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Desireless - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
John Bouvin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Marko Kemppainen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:01, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mobile_demo_anal_party_iv.jpg

I have tagged File:Mobile_demo_anal_party_iv.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 13:41, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Svinhufvud.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Svinhufvud.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:41, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of The Smackdown

I have nominated The Smackdown, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Smackdown. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 21:46, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rglinelogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rglinelogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:48, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of The Smackdown

I have nominated The Smackdown, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Smackdown (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 01:32, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Man-Faye (4th nomination)

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Man-Faye (4th nomination). --Gwern (contribs) 11:19 4 August 2010 (GMT) 11:19, 4 August 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Eurowayship.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Eurowayship.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:10, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Another world album cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Another world album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:38, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

John Henrion

Do you have a source that said he was traded from the Elmira Jackals? Raul17 (talk) 05:00, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you check his eliteprospects entry you can see that he was traded from Florida Everblades to Elmira Jackals. He did not play any games for Elmira but went to Finland instead. He talks about the trade at 00:53 in this interview, great guy :). bbx (talk) 09:09, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No disrespect was intended; I thought that you meant that he was traded again because of the wording in your edit summary. I was looking for some annoucement from the Elmira Jackals stating Henrion's status. When a player signs with an European team, old team normally would place him on the suspended list to keep his ECHL's rights. I have not seen the interview yet. Thanks! Raul17 (talk) 00:02, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No disrespect taken. Sorry for being unclear. bbx (talk) 10:47, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Emilia Vuorisalmi

Hi! Thanks for your comment on the page about Emilia that I wrote. The discussion is still going on regarding the deletion of the page - is there any way I can speed up this discussion or what would you say I should do to make the page better and ready to be consensually accepted? Thanks for the help (if you have time to help :) WP novice — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nemanja.rodic (talk • contribs)

Hi, no problem. There's not much you can do to speed up the process other than convincing the nominator to withdraw it. Take a look at how other good articles are written, then improve your article accordingly and source it well. If people still vote on it to be deleted you're all out of luck. bbx (talk) 16:31, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mobile demo anal party iv.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mobile demo anal party iv.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. czar ♔ 18:29, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of NukeZone for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NukeZone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NukeZone (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Deunanknute (talk) 13:54, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eagle-eye cherry desireless cover.jpg

This image is a rerelease of Desireless (album). I uploaded what I believed the artwork of the earlier edition. Shall I delete the white background artwork then? --George Ho (talk) 09:05, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Nykarleby.png

Thank you for uploading File:Nykarleby.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:57, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bbx. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bbx. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tjernobyl listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tjernobyl. Since you had some involvement with the Tjernobyl redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 17:54, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Svinhufvud.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Svinhufvud.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bbx. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Life (tv)

Hi, I'm Famousdog. Bbx, thanks for creating Life (tv)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. There is a clear conflict of interest here. The creator of the page has referred to the channel as "we".

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Famousdog (woof)(grrr) 09:24, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Life (tv)

Hello Bbx,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Life (tv) for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Famousdog (woof)(grrr) 09:24, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why the heck are you contacting me about this? bbx (talk) 16:00, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Van (band) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Van (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Van (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~SML • TP 16:40, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bbx. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ginza Musik

The article Ginza Musik has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:33, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Up North (TV programme)

The article Up North (TV programme) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable, WP:BEFORE shows no evidence of reliable, secondary sources that could even verify its existence

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 10:29, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Extras (tv)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Extras (tv) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 2#Extras (tv) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Bassie f (talk) 09:53, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 100 höjdare

The article 100 höjdare has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article. Only managed to find trivial mentions of the subject or its listing in databases, social media, online stores and fan sites. Lacks significant and reliable coverage from secondary sources to pass WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 14:26, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"The internets" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The internets has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 11 § The internets until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 15:43, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Vikram(actor)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Vikram(actor) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 15 § Vikram(actor) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:04, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 100 höjdare for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 100 höjdare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/100 höjdare until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

HappyWith (talk) 17:04, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect listed at Redirects for discussion

A redirect or redirects you have created has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 13 § Redirects. with periods following "the" until a consensus is reached. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 14:12, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]